Robotics paper index
TaPeR: Probabilistic Recovery of Sparse Task Precedence Graphs from a Handful of Demonstrations
One-line summary
A robotics research paper on TaPeR: Probabilistic Recovery of Sparse Task Precedence Graphs from a Handful of Demonstrations.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
Long-horizon manipulation tasks are often only partially ordered. For example, when assembling an electronic device, the battery and circuit board may be installed in either order, but both must be in place before the enclosure is closed. Recovering such dependencies enables robots to flexibly reorder subtasks while preserving task validity. Existing approaches typically infer task structure from human demonstrations using both temporal and symbolic supervision. However, symbolic predicates require explicit grounding, which is difficult to obtain in realistic settings. In this work, we present an approach for extracting task dependency structures from demonstrations using only simple kinematic graphs and distributions over relative object poses. From these representations, our method estimates pairwise task-step-dependency probabilities and uses them to initialize the edge weights of a precedence graph. We then introduce a filtering pipeline that converts this graph of probability estimates into the final task dependency graph. We evaluate our approach on an existing benchmark and on a new dataset comprising longer tasks with more complex dependencies. We find that our method recovers more accurate task structures from fewer demonstrations than the baselines. Finally, we demonstrate that the inferred graphs can be used to generate multiple valid robotic execution orders for the same task.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments