Robotics paper index

Preview-Based Relative-Motion Control of an Insertion Tool for Neural-Thread Placement in Pulsating Tissue

2026-08-09 · arXiv: 2608.08860

One-line summary

A robotics research paper on Preview-Based Relative-Motion Control of an Insertion Tool for Neural-Thread Placement in Pulsating Tissue.

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Robotic neural-thread placement requires regulating the insertion-tool tip relative to tissue that moves with cardiac and respiratory pulsation. This paper develops a preview-based relative-motion controller that estimates latency-delayed periodic surface motion, predicts it over a short horizon, and uses offset-free model predictive control to regulate relative placement while limiting actuator effort and lateral relative velocity. In MuJoCo, the 1-DOF controller achieves 12.0\um\ free-space and 1.9\um\ contact RMS relative-placement error, versus 18.3/176.8\um\ for delayed-feedback impedance and 286.1/275.5\um\ for lab-frame PD, at the cost of higher peak contact force (3.43 versus 2.00~mN) since offset-free tracking drives the tip fully to the commanded depth rather than yielding against the tissue. In 3 DOF, coupled preview reduces contact lateral shear from 1.34 to 0.50~mm/s with 2.1\um\ lateral RMS error. A feasibility-restored octagonal shear formulation keeps the QP solvable under degraded sensing by adding a bounded shared slack: at 10\um\ RMS per-axis sensing noise, where a matched cost-only controller violates the 0.80~mm/s budget in all 10 seeds (mean/maximum 0.988/1.175~mm/s), the soft-octagon controller completes all 10 seeds with no fallback and no measured violation (0.653/0.712~mm/s), with its operating envelope characterized up to 15\um\ RMS. A two-vertex Lyapunov certificate for the controller's actual finite-horizon error-feedback gain holds over $-40\%/{+}50\%$ reflected-mass mismatch. The modeled tip is a rigid contact point, and the study is simulation-only: flexible-thread and carrier-needle mechanics, a validated transient-force constraint, biological damage thresholds, and hardware-realistic sensing and timing remain required before deployment.

5.0Engineering value
7.0Research novelty
4.0Business relevance

Links and sources

Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?

Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.

Request B2B research

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this paper.
Login or register to leave a comment