Robotics paper index

Learning Side-by-Side Navigation for Personal Mobility Vehicles from Human Drivers

2026-10-27 · arXiv: 2610.36726

One-line summary

A robotics research paper on Learning Side-by-Side Navigation for Personal Mobility Vehicles from Human Drivers.

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

This paper presents an approach to achieve side-by-side autonomous motion with a pair of personal mobility vehicles (PMVs). Given a global path, two PMVs plan cooperatively so as to hold a social formation that lets the passengers hold a conversation, while keeping the ride safe and smooth. Each vehicle runs its own sampling-based model-predictive planner; the planners exchange nothing but the odometry each vehicle could observe of the other, and the joint decision is expressed as a pair of utility matrices over pairs of candidate trajectories, resolved by a common rule. The behavioural parameters are fitted by inverse reinforcement learning from 409 minutes of driving by ten pairs of people in human-driven PMVs in an indoor environment, and the lanes the pair can use are derived offline from the corridor itself rather than fixed by hand. A safety layer the cost cannot override executes a move only if the vehicle can still brake clear, measured from its whole body, and a vehicle that is stuck reverses along its own path and continues. In closed-loop simulation over 24 runs in the conditions the drivers were recorded in and 24 in four generated obstacle layouts, no vehicle entered a wall or a cone. The pair holds conversational formation for 60.5 and 68.9 percent of the time among obstacles (anticlockwise and clockwise) and 81.2 and 91.5 percent in a clear aisle, against the drivers' 34.0 and 36.0 percent, and 52.9 and 56.0 percent, and it matches their speed. It keeps one lateral formation where the drivers alternated between a close diagonal and a wide abreast one, and it varies far less. Experimental results are based on a differential drive kinematic simulator running on ROS 2.

5.0Engineering value
7.0Research novelty
4.0Business relevance

Links and sources

Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?

Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.

Request B2B research

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this paper.
Login or register to leave a comment